Sarah Stein is well known in the community of people who work with former offenders. While she is based in Las Vegas, Nevada
 she can been all over the western United States and her impact is felt 
all over the country.   Ms. Stein has written extensively about 
expungement and other forms of post-conviction relief.  She recently 
provided behind the scenes guidance on expungement reform in California.
JA - Thank
 you for answering a few questions and sharing your insight with me and 
my readers.   Tell me about the research you are working on right now.
SS -
 You are very welcome.  It is always a pleasure to talk with you.  A big
 part of what I do is advocate for changes in the area of 
post-conviction relief.   I have never had a problem making arguments in
 favor of reform.  However, those arguments were always based on 
common-sense or basic notions of fairness.  I really wanted statistical 
evidence to validate our assertions that good expungement laws reduce 
crime and save taxpayers money by reducing the costs of the criminal 
justice system and other social welfare programs.
JA - Let
 me interrupt you there.  Has anyone every questioned the validity of 
the assertion that expungement laws can save taxpayer's money and reduce
 crime?
SS - Nobody has ever posed the question 
with skepticism that it achives those goals, but I have had plenty of 
people ask about the extent of potential savings.  Which is a fair 
question and one that I want to be able to answer.  That is why we are 
starting this research project.
JA - What do you hope to do with the research?
SS - Well,
 I am sure we will write about it like crazy, no matter what the outcome
 is.  My goal is, first and foremost, is to conduct a good study.  I am 
not setting out to prove a hypothesis.  I want this to be as scientific 
as possible and a valid as possible.  If the data shows, what I suspect 
it will show, I think it will help lawmakers make decisions about how 
many resources to allocate towards providing expungement programs.  It 
would help them make good decisions if they can see the return on 
investment.
JA - From what I hear, you helped behind the scenes with recent changes to California's laws that were made by SB 530.
SS - Yes,
 but it was a very small role.  Mat Higbee came to me a few times and 
sought-out advise on lobbying for passage of the bill and for feedback 
on some of the language he was drafting.  But, I know that I am just one
 of many that he worked with.  In the end, it is Senator Wright and his 
staff that really deserve the credit.  I am sure Mat can tell you more 
about the process and what is going to happen next.  I know they are 
still fighting and that there is much more that he wants to do in 
California. I think expanding felony reduction is the priority right 
now.
JA - Are you active in the legislative process in other states?
SS - I
 haven't been for the past couple of years.  Lobbying is best done 
face-to-face and I haven't been able to travel much the past two years 
because of my commitments in Las Vegas.  However, I miss it, and it is 
an exciting time with so many states expanding their expungement laws.  
There are some good opportunities to make excellent public policy.  Even
 Florida is considering expanding it's Florida expungement law.   I am enjoying see the positive changes all across the country.
JA - Thank you again Sarah. Where can people read you study when it is done?
SS - I am hoping the New York Times.   But I am not holding my breath.  Either way, it can be found on my site Nevada-Expungement.com
No comments:
Post a Comment